Rutgers AAUP-AFT is pleased to announce that the union has reached a settlement between the Rutgers administration and the AAUP-AFT bargaining unit on the “Faculty Transition to Retirement Program” (FTTRP) for tenured and tenure-track faculty. The Executive Council reported a unanimous vote. They recommend a positive vote in support of this agreement: Click here to read the FTTRP agreement and below is a summary explanation from colleague Rudy Bell, who has been closely involved in negotiations over “Phased Retirement” for nearly a decade.
The information is being provided to all potentially eligible bargaining unit members via email. Only full members may vote. Those faculty who are not yet full members may join now to vote on this question. Faculty who join no later than Thursday, October 8 at 5 PM will be sent a link to the ballot. The last day to cast the ratification ballot is Monday, October 12 by 5 PM.
To: Tenured and Tenure-Track Rutgers faculty members
From: Rudy Bell, History Department NB-SAS
We won, sort of.
David Hughes asked me to provide some background information on the “Faculty Transition to Retirement Program” (FTTRP) and I am pleased to do so. Going back nearly a decade, to early planning for what became the 2007-2011 Contract, we developed and then negotiated for what we called “Phased Retirement”. Our initial research included surveys of more than forty peer institutions, some with (but mostly without) unionized faculty. Nearly all had written provisions of one sort or another to provide for faculty, no longer constrained by age-based forced retirement, who wished to consider some form of gradual, partial, or transitional retirement. At Rutgers there was no policy, although there were numerous instances of “individual arrangements” reached with faculty interested in phased retirement. The Union filed OPRA requests for redacted copies of these “individual arrangements” and studied their varying terms.
We ultimately formulated a “five years of half-work for half-pay” (50/50 for 5) proposal, which was for a longer term and a higher rate of pay than any of the individual arrangements existent at RU but within the boundaries of a few of the more attractive programs we surveyed nationwide. Alas, we failed to achieve inclusion of any form of our phased retirement proposal in the formal contract negotiations that followed, apparently because the Rutgers administration preferred its “individual arrangements” approach. We did agree on a one-time buyout plan in 2009 and it benefited a few members. However, significant numbers of potentially eligible faculty did not find the terms sufficiently favorable, perhaps because the arrangements were neither phased nor transitional.
More recently, the administration expressed some openness to developing a formal phased retirement program but progress was halted by the refusal of the NJ State Division of Pensions to allow multi-year arrangements, despite the joint efforts of the Administration and the Union to overcome such objections, unfounded in our judgment. The agreement you are voting upon works within the compromise ruling by the State of New Jersey on time limits. The maximum length of any individual FTTRP is three years and it must be completed within a five-year limit, after which date the entire agreement on multi-year agreements will sunset. Thereafter, only one-year agreements will be allowed and any pre-existing agreements with provisions lasting more than one year after the sunset will end within the year after sunset. A further restriction of the state regulations is that no salary increases are permitted under the agreements. Fortunately, directives from Trenton are not as immutable as laws of nature and we will work to un-sunset the proposed sunset…but that remains for the future. As of now, agreements cannot last more than three years and must be completed within six years.
So, we do not have all we aimed for on length of agreement. But we did achieve our primary goal of half pay for half work (50/50), an arrangement that is outstanding relative to “individual agreements” for those RU faculty who have formally retired in the past decade and that ranks at the top of what progressive institutions are offering nationally. Again as mandated by NJ Division of Pension regulations, the agreement applies only to full-time, tenured faculty with 10 years of service who are 55 or older and in the Alternate Benefit Program (ABP) for retirement benefits.
Moreover, beyond the stated restrictions, individuals will need to “negotiate” just what half work means – fall, not spring? half the usual teaching responsibility? this year, not next? Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday morning but no work from Thursday afternoon through Monday? – whatever meets your needs and attains your dean’s approval. Your Union is here and a good place to consult about possible arrangements but the contractual agreement leaves much latitude. Once you reach an agreement, you are protected by the contractual grievance procedure, Article IX, which is robust but admittedly slow and inevitably not as strong as the tenure you are required to relinquish. Still, you remain a welcome part of the academic community, with your work and your pay protected for an agreed-upon term of service.
Participation in the program is optional for both parties. Faculty remain free to make arrangements outside the framework of FTTRP, for example waiver of requirement to return after a sabbatical or assignment to research only duties for a length of time while still fully employed.
A vote to approve the FTTRP agreement as a union member does not obligate you to personally participate, but it will strengthen the bargaining position of individual faculty who find a phased or transitional retirement program attractive and who seek truly prorated pay for their continuing work after formal retirement. It brings some transparency and consistency to the process.